Previewing the new IPCC assessment of risks of climate change impacts


Several news sources, including The Guardian, the Associated Press, and the Yomiuri Shimbun, have published articles from Japan previewing some strong conclusions to expect in the IPCC climate change assessment report on Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, to be released in Yokohama on March 31. It's good to see this latest IPCC report on the impacts of global climatic disruption, drafted and reviewed by many of the leading scientists in multiple disciplines, focusing on risk assessment, risk management, and preparedness. Continue reading

Posted in Assessments of Climate Impacts and Adaptation | Leave a comment

Matt Ridley op-ed is a laundry list of IPCC misrepresentations


Right on cue, Matt Ridley has another error-filled opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal anticipating the forthcoming Working Group II (WG2) release of the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In reality, the WG2 report reveals that climate change is an increasingly urgent threat and that our level of adaptation and preparedness remains low. Continue reading

Posted in Assessments of Climate Impacts and Adaptation, Global Warming Denial Machine | Leave a comment

A huge deal: Exxon agrees to evaluate the "stranded asset" risk of climate action


Exxon's agreement to discuss in their financial filings the risk of their assets being stranded by climate policy is a huge deal, marking a milestone in the climate policy battle, writes climate and energy analyst Jonathan Koomey. "The financial markets are starting to realize that the 'booked' reserves of the fossil fuel companies are based on a fallacy... It’s the beginning of the end of the fossil fuel economy, but the big players just don’t realize it yet (or if they realize it, they’re not admitting it)." Continue reading

Posted in Climate Change Mitigation, Energy | 1 Comment

Pielke misrepresents climate/extreme weather connection… again


In a replay of the argument he’s made for years, political scientist Roger Pielke Jr. attempts to dismiss the wide array of evidence linking climate change to extreme weather. Pielke’s selective use of data, an approach that has brought him repeated criticism from respected scientists, is featured on the new FiveThirtyEight website, which claims to rely on data to better report the news. Continue reading

Posted in Science Communication | 6 Comments

Support the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund


To protect scientists from the threat of politically motivated attacks, the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund needs to raise $80,000 to step up its effectiveness in providing legal resources to the climate science community. Continue reading

Posted in Attacks on Climate Science and Scientists | Leave a comment

White House climate change preparedness event and Climate Data Intiative


the_white_houseOn March 19 the White House, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) are hosting an event aimed at highlighting government and private sector efforts to enhance climate change preparedness.  Also today, in conjunction with this event, the Administration is launching a Climate Data Initiative — "a broad effort to leverage the Federal Government’s extensive, freely-available climate-relevant data resources to stimulate innovation and private-sector entrepreneurship in support of national climate-change preparedness." This continues the development of a national climate change preparedness process, which we first called for in March 2008. It has taken almost 26 years – since the global warming problem was first recognized as a major public issue -- to get to this stage. Continue reading

Posted in Climate Change Preparedness, Obama Climate Plan | 1 Comment

Michael Mann motion to dismiss Mark Steyn's counter-suit via DC court anti-SLAPP provision

Superior Court of the District of Columbia

Superior Court of the District of Columbia

In the Michael Mann v. National Review et al. defamation lawsuit, Mann has filed a "Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims of Counter-Plaintiff Mark Steyn Pursuant to the D.C. Anti-SLAPP Act". A memorandum in support of Mann's motion says: "Steyn's counterclaims lack any merit whatsoever, and his assertion of these claims in the face of the Court's previous rulings is yet another manifestation of his disdain for this Court and its processes. ... not to mention the stream of invective that he has hurled at this Court..."
Continue reading

Posted in Attacks on Climate Science and Scientists | 11 Comments

More on why Keystone XL is not in the national or global interest


The State Department's Keystone XL tar sands pipeline environmental impact statement doesn’t include any scenario in which the U.S. comes anywhere close to meeting the Obama administration's climate goals, Peter Sinclair at Climate Crocks points out. The study fails to disclose that its conclusions are only valid in the context of American and global climate policy failure. An economic analysis by the Carbon Tracker Initiative concludes that, in its Keystone XL environmental assessment, the State Department severely underestimated the pipeline’s impact on increasing tar sands oil production, and the resulting growth in greenhouse gas emissions. And citing multiple concerns that have received too little attention thus far in discussions of the tar sands, National Nurses United are calling on Secretary of State Kerry to conduct a comprehensive study of how the proposed pipeline would impact public health. Continue reading

Posted in Climate Change Mitigation, Obama Administration, Science-Policy Interaction | 1 Comment

New York Times op-ed asks wrong questions on climate change and California drought


A new opinion piece in the New York Times downplays the many lines of scientific evidence connecting climate change to the ongoing drought in California. The op-ed by NOAA’s Dr. Martin Hoerling addresses only the question of direct causation, and fails to address the fact that climate change is already making droughts worse, including the California drought. Continue reading

Posted in Assessments of Climate Impacts and Adaptation, Science Communication | Leave a comment

Upcoming Senate hearing on Keystone XL National Interest Determination


capitol_domeAt a hearing March 13 on "Keystone XL and the National Interest Determination," the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will hear testimony from James Hansen, Sierra Club executive director Michael Brune, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and Gen. (Ret.) James Jones, former Obama national security adviser and now a paid advisor to the American Petroleum Institute. Continue reading

Posted in Congress: Legislation and Oversight | 2 Comments