<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Science Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org</link>
	<description>Promoting integrity in the use of climate science in government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:06:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.3" -->
	<itunes:summary>Promoting integrity in the use of climate science in government</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Climate Science Watch</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Promoting integrity in the use of climate science in government</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Questions from Al Jazeera on US climate and environmental policy in an election year</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/02/03/questions-from-al-jazeera-on-us-climate-and-environmental-policy-in-an-election-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/02/03/questions-from-al-jazeera-on-us-climate-and-environmental-policy-in-an-election-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Climate Science Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Science Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=5071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Jazeera English asked us on Inside Story: US 2012:  How do we assess Obama’s performance on climate change during the past three years? Environmental concerns don’t figure very highly when people are asked to prioritize their concerns ahead of &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/02/03/questions-from-al-jazeera-on-us-climate-and-environmental-policy-in-an-election-year/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/02/03/questions-from-al-jazeera-on-us-climate-and-environmental-policy-in-an-election-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Like dentists practicing cardiology” – Climate scientists respond to Wall Street Journal disinformer op-ed. When you’re talking about planetary life suppport, it really matters what your credentials are.</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/02/01/like-dentists-practicing-cardiology-climate-scientists-respond-to-wall-street-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/02/01/like-dentists-practicing-cardiology-climate-scientists-respond-to-wall-street-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Piltz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Denial Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=5056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a letter to the WSJ, 38 climate science experts call down Rupert Murdoch’s newspaper for publishing an op-ed ("No Need to Panic About Global Warming") "by the climate-science equivalent of dentists practicing cardiology. While accomplished in their own fields," &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/02/01/like-dentists-practicing-cardiology-climate-scientists-respond-to-wall-street-journal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/02/01/like-dentists-practicing-cardiology-climate-scientists-respond-to-wall-street-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boykoff: Obama’s rhetoric of ‘clean energy’ vs. the reality of  climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/29/boykoff-obamas-rhetoric-of-clean-energy-vs-the-reality-of-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/29/boykoff-obamas-rhetoric-of-clean-energy-vs-the-reality-of-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Piltz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=5045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“What do we lose when global warming and climate change get repackaged as clean energy?” asks University of Colorado Prof. Max Boykoff in today’s Washington Post. “We wind up missing a thorough understanding of the breadth of the problem and &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/29/boykoff-obamas-rhetoric-of-clean-energy-vs-the-reality-of-climate-change/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/29/boykoff-obamas-rhetoric-of-clean-energy-vs-the-reality-of-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Climate Change Envoy calls Durban climate summit a success</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/27/us-climate-change-envoy-calls-durban-climate-summit-a-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/27/us-climate-change-envoy-calls-durban-climate-summit-a-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katherine O'Konski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Climate Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=5029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Representing the Obama Administration at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Jonathan Pershing, senior US climate negotiator at the State Department, took a more positive view of the 17th Conference of the Parties in Durban, South Africa, than CSW &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/27/us-climate-change-envoy-calls-durban-climate-summit-a-success/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/27/us-climate-change-envoy-calls-durban-climate-summit-a-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PEER adopts the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/26/peer-adopts-the-climate-science-legal-defense-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/26/peer-adopts-the-climate-science-legal-defense-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Climate Science Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attacks on Climate Science and Scientists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=5013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Climate Science Legal Defense Fund, established last year to support climate scientists who are under attack by the global warming denial machine, has teamed up with a new sponsor, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. This is a good development &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/26/peer-adopts-the-climate-science-legal-defense-fund/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/26/peer-adopts-the-climate-science-legal-defense-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PEER alleges scientific misconduct at NOAA in lowballing of BP spill rate, traces political pressure to White House</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/24/peer-alleges-scientific-misconduct-at-noaa-in-lowballing-of-bp-spill-rate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/24/peer-alleges-scientific-misconduct-at-noaa-in-lowballing-of-bp-spill-rate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Climate Science Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=5001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility has filed a formal allegation of scientific misconduct by a senior scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, charging that he manipulated and falsified scientific communication to policymakers and the public so as to &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/24/peer-alleges-scientific-misconduct-at-noaa-in-lowballing-of-bp-spill-rate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/24/peer-alleges-scientific-misconduct-at-noaa-in-lowballing-of-bp-spill-rate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Greedy Lying Bastards” – forthcoming film a “searing indictment” of the fossil fuel industry</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/21/greedy-lying-bastards-forthcoming-film/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/21/greedy-lying-bastards-forthcoming-film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Climate Science Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Science Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=4991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Craig Rosebraugh, a US filmmaker and political activist, has produced a feature-length documentary that demands to be seen,” writes Leo Hickman in the UK Guardian. “If the trailer and impressive roster of interviewees are anything to go by, it's likely &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/21/greedy-lying-bastards-forthcoming-film/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/21/greedy-lying-bastards-forthcoming-film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Obama Proposal Could Weaken Key Climate Agency”</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/20/obama-proposal-could-weaken-key-climate-ageny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/20/obama-proposal-could-weaken-key-climate-ageny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Climate Science Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Science Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=4986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The White House proposal that would move the country’s oceans and atmosphere agency — the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) — from its current home in the Commerce Department and fold it into the Interior Department, could severely undermine &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/20/obama-proposal-could-weaken-key-climate-ageny/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/20/obama-proposal-could-weaken-key-climate-ageny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s denial of Keystone XL tar sands pipeline permit was an easy decision, for now</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/19/obamas-denial-of-keystone-xl-tar-sands-pipeline-permit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/19/obamas-denial-of-keystone-xl-tar-sands-pipeline-permit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Piltz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=4974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The congressionally imposed 60-day deadline for a permit decision gave President Obama, under pressure from both sides, a different way to get what he had sought earlier: postponing a final decision on the pipeline until after the 2012 election.  Environmentalists &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/19/obamas-denial-of-keystone-xl-tar-sands-pipeline-permit/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/19/obamas-denial-of-keystone-xl-tar-sands-pipeline-permit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t disrupt NOAA’s climate change activities with Obama’s proposed agency re-shuffle</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/17/dont-disrupt-noaa-climate-change-activities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/17/dont-disrupt-noaa-climate-change-activities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Piltz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Science Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/?p=4957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“How does it help us with the things we need from NOAA?” we said to ClimateWire, questioning the President’s proposal to subsume the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration into the Department of the Interior. “Is it going to help those &#8230; <a href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/17/dont-disrupt-noaa-climate-change-activities/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2012/01/17/dont-disrupt-noaa-climate-change-activities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

