Ridenhour Truth-Telling Prize to whistleblower Thomas Tamm for exposing secret wiretapping program


Former Justice Department lawyer Thomas Tamm will be awarded The 2009 Ridenhour Prize for Truth-Telling at the National Press Club in Washington, DC, on April 16. Tamm courageously exposed the existence of the government’s secret warrantless wiretapping program to the New York Times.  This year’s 6th annual Ridenhour Prizes also will go to Bob Herbert, New York Times columnist; Jane Mayer, author of The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals; and reporter Nick Turse, author of “A My Lai a Month.”

The event will be webcast live from the awards luncheon at noon on Thursday, April 16.

The prizes memorialize the spirit of fearless truth-telling that whistleblower and investigative journalist Ron Ridenhour reflected throughout his extraordinary life and career. Ron Ridenhour was the Vietnam veteran whose letter in 1969 to Congress and the Pentagon describing the horrific events at My Lai – the infamous massacre of the Vietnam War – brought the scandal to the attention of the American public and the world.

In an in-depth interview with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! this morning, Thomas Tamm talked about the events leading up to his decision to blow the whistle, his departure from the Department of Justice, and the serious personal consequences he suffers today as a result. 

See our earlier posts:

Remarks by Bill Moyers on accepting the 2008 Ridenhour Courage Prize

Remarks by Rick Piltz on accepting the 2006 Ridenhour Prize for Truth-Telling

Winners of the 2009 Ridenhour Prizes

The Ridenhour Courage Prize is presented to an individual in recognition of his or her courageous and life-long defense of the public interest and passionate commitment to social justice.  New York Times op-ed columnist Bob Herbert has been awarded The Ridenhour Courage Prize in recognition of the overall distinction and fearless truth-telling of his reporting. Whether he is exposing abuses of power, complacency in the face of urgent need or the enduring racial divide, Herbert’s columns form the moral center of American journalism.  Read more… 

The Ridenhour Book Prize honors an outstanding work of social significance from the prior publishing year. The prize also recognizes investigative and reportorial distinction.  Jane Mayer, author of The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals, has been awarded The Ridenhour Book Prize for her damning indictment of how the United States made self-destructive decisions in the wake of 9/11 that not only violated the Constitution and American values, but also hindered the pursuit of Al Qaeda.  Read more… 

Historian and journalist Nick Turse has been awarded a special Ridenhour Prize for Reportorial Distinction for his Nation article “A My Lai a Month,” which proved Ron Ridenhour’s long-held conviction that the massacre at My Lai was not an aberration.  Read more…

The Ridenhour Prize for Truth-Telling is presented to a citizen, corporate or government whistleblower, investigative journalist, or organization for bringing a specific issue of social importance to the public’s attention.  Former Justice Department lawyer Thomas Tamm has been awarded The Ridenhour Prize for Truth-Telling. Tamm courageously exposed the existence of the government’s secret warrantless wiretapping program to the New York TimesRead more…

Thomas Tamm
2009 recipient of the Ridenhour Truth-Telling Prize

On December 16, 2005, The New York Times published an explosive article about the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping program—the secret surveillance of U.S. citizens without the court’s knowledge or approval. “BUSH LETS U.S. SPY ON CALLERS WITHOUT COURTS,” read the headline. Though the story, written by Eric Lichtblau and James Risen, relied on nearly a dozen sources, the reporters had first been tipped off 18 months earlier about the existence of this program by former Justice Department lawyer Thomas Tamm.

Tamm hails from a family steeped in FBI history. His uncle, Edward Tamm, was a top aide to J. Edgar Hoover and as a toddler, Thomas often crawled under Hoover’s desk during FBI ceremonies. His uncle is credited with creating the name for the FBI, as well as its motto, Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity. Tamm’s father, Quin Tamm, was a high-ranking bureau official while his mother, Ora Belle Tamm, was a secretary at the identification division. Even Tamm’s brother, who served on the 9/11 Commission, is a veteran FBI agent.

Thomas Tamm’s career took a different path. The 57-year-old former public prosecutor worked for years in the Montgomery County State’s Attorney’s Office in Maryland before landing a job at the Department of Justice (DOJ). While serving in the Capital Case Unit there, then-Attorney General Janet Reno personally handed him one of the DOJ’s highest honors, the John Marshall Award. In 2003, he transferred to the highly sensitive Office of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR).

The OIPR lawyers procure warrants for national security wiretaps of alleged terrorists and spies and present the applications for these warrants to secret hearings at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA). The FISA court was set up by Congress in 1978 to prevent the sort of abuse of citizens’ privacy by U.S. intelligence agencies that occurred in the 1970s. Presided over by 11 rotating federal judges, this court determined the legal legitimacy of such warrants
It was in the winter of 2003 that Tamm became aware of the existence of a secret program in the OIPR. Roughly 10 percent of warrant requests went through a separate channel that bypassed the FISA judges and could be signed only by the Attorney-General or the chief judge of the court. These warrants looked like all the rest, so Tamm wondered about the need for such an unusual procedure. When he asked colleagues about the process, a senior counsel told him she didn’t know about it but assumed that it was “probably illegal.”

Tamm agonized over what to do. Speaking with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow—in his first TV interview since the December 2008 Newsweek article revealing his identity as the New York Times whistleblower—he said he was worried that they were aiding and abetting a criminal act. A man who had “spent his entire life dedicated to enforcing the law,” Tamm felt sure that this program was “not what the Department of Justice is about.”

Having decided to speak out, sweating and with his heartbeat racing, Tamm made a phone call to Lichtblau from a pay phone in the subway station at Judiciary Square Metro. According to Lichtblau’s subsequent book about this story, Tamm was “maddeningly vague”—mostly because he didn’t precisely know what the mysterious “program” was about, just that it “didn’t smell right” and ought to be investigated. “It’s stunning that somebody higher up in the chain of command didn’t speak up,” Tamm later told Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff.

When Tamm placed the call to The New York Times in the spring of 2004, he had already grown disenchanted with his job. He missed the courtroom and felt he would be more valuable in a position with greater demand for his legal skills. So Tamm transferred out of the OIPR on his own initiative and started working at the U.S. Attorney’s office. It would take the Times 18 long months to run the explosive story across its front page. Despite the delayed publication of the article, the newspaper won a Pulitzer Prize for the story; the reporters, Lichtblau and Risen, wrote critically acclaimed books.

As for Tamm, five years since his courageous act, he still doesn’t know what his future holds. The FBI has been relentless in tracking down his friends, relatives and former colleagues in order to build a case against him. Not long after the Times story was published, Tamm started getting telephone calls from the FBI. He was also suffering from depression. He had trouble concentrating on work and in late 2006, by mutual agreement with his superiors, he resigned.
In August 2007, 18 FBI officials marched into his home—some wearing black flak jackets and carrying guns—with a search warrant and seized his desktop computer, his children’s laptops, his personal papers, some of his books, even the family’s Christmas card list. They grilled his wife and two of his three children. After the raid, they encouraged Tamm to plead guilty to a felony charge, which he refused to do.

Since his call to the Times, Tamm racked up $30,000 in legal fees and is struggling to make a living practicing law at the assistant state’s attorney’s office in Rockville, Maryland, a suburb of Washington, D.C. Thanks to the publicity resulting from the Newsweek cover story, donations have helped ease his burden of legal debt. He is unsure whether he will be prosecuted or not. He faces potential charges related to two statutes: the disclosure of information vital to national defense and an espionage-related statute related to communications intelligence. Both carry 10-year prison terms. Recent legal decisions and the writings of some of Obama’s nominees for the Department of Justice have given Tamm reason to be hopeful that he will not be charged. The federal prosecutor has told Tamm’s lawyer that his case, though not top priority, is on Attorney-General Eric Holder’s desk, awaiting his decision.

This award is intended to celebrate those who courageously act to preserve the rule of law rather than simply acquiesce to its violation. At great personal risk, Thomas Tamm exposed the lawless activities of powerful forces whose subversion of the Constitution and national security laws recall Ron Ridenhour’s struggle against a military establishment that believed it was necessary to “destroy the village in order to save it.”

Thomas Tamm worked at a Justice Department that, in the name of national security, had abandoned the core principles that form the basis of our democracy and our individual liberties. The fact that he still faces a threat of criminal prosecution at the hands of an institution which itself was operating outside of the law, is in and of itself a national disgrace. What makes Tamm’s case even more poignant is that there remains not a single authorized avenue for a national security whistleblower to use and receive protection when they challenge the Executive Branch for breaking the law. Today, we honor a person who has imperiled his own future liberty to preserve the liberties of all of us who live in this nation.

The Ridenhour Prizes were established by The Nation Institute and The Fertel Foundation in partnership with The Fund for Constitutional Government, Government Accountability Project and The Project on Government Oversight.

Randy Fertel’s fine essay, “Remembering Ron: The Whistleblower Paradox,” includes these lines:

Speaking truth to power, whistleblowers are crucial to the health of a free society and inevitably troublesome to the powerful. In a democracy, whistleblowing is one of the unlegislated checks and balances. Or, if investigative journalism serves an open society as a fourth estate, watchdogging the activities of the other three, then whistleblowers are a kind of fifth estate. They help to make organizations accountable and individuals responsible for their actions. Corporations and public servants can do nefarious things behind closed doors, but they never know who in their ranks will feel ill at ease enough to come forward and make wrongdoing public.


This entry was posted in Whistleblowers. Bookmark the permalink.